{"id":3300,"date":"2019-07-24T20:19:01","date_gmt":"2019-07-24T19:19:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cms.auto-ui.org\/19\/?page_id=3300"},"modified":"2020-09-17T07:56:39","modified_gmt":"2020-09-17T06:56:39","slug":"tuesday","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/cms.auto-ui.org\/20\/program\/tuesday\/","title":{"rendered":"Tuesday"},"content":{"rendered":"
Tuesday: virtual conference<\/p>\n
Program information will be updated regularly until the start of AutomotiveUI 2020.<\/p>\n
Organizers:<\/strong> Max Participants:<\/strong> Primary Contact:<\/strong> Description:<\/strong> Organizers:<\/strong> Max Participants:<\/strong> Primary Contact:<\/strong> Description:<\/strong> Moderator:<\/strong> Evaluating Highly Automated Trucks as Signaling Lights,\u00a0 Designing Communication Strategies of Autonomous Vehicles With Pedestrians: An Intercultural Study Impact of Hand Signals on Safety: Two Controlled Studies With Novice E-Scooter Riders Moderator:<\/strong> The Role and Potentials of Field User Interaction Data in the Automotive UX Development Lifecycle: An Industry Perspective Gaze-based Interaction with Windshield Displays for Automated Driving: Impact of Dwell-time and Feedback Design on Task Performance and Subjective Workload Dealing with Input Uncertainty in Automotive Voice Assistants \u201cWatch out!\u201d: Prediction-Level Intervention for Automated Driving 01. “Give Me the Keys, I\u2019ll Drive!” Results from an Exploratory Interview Study to assess Public\u2019s Desires and Concerns on Automated Valet Parking<\/strong> 03. An Exploration of Users’ Thoughts on Rear-Seat Productivity in Virtual Reality<\/strong> 05. Ultrahapticons: \u201cHaptifying\u201d Drivers\u2019 Mental Models to Transform Automotive Mid-Air Haptic Gesture Infotainment Interfaces<\/strong> 08. Towards A Framework of Detecting Mode Confusion in Automated Driving: Examples of Data from Older Drivers<\/strong> 10. Toward Minimum Startle After Take-Over Request: A Preliminary Study of Physiological Data<\/strong> 11. Exploring the Effectiveness of External Human-Machine Interfaces on Pedestrians and Drivers<\/strong> 15. Addressing Rogue Vehicles by Integrating Computer Vision, Activity Monitoring, and Contextual Information<\/strong> 19. Haptic Feedback for the Transfer of Control in Autonomous Vehicles<\/strong> 20. A Gender Study of Communication Interfaces between an Autonomous Car and a Pedestrian<\/strong> 22. Sensor Fusion Based State Estimation for Localization of Autonomous Vehicle<\/strong> 23. VR-PAVIB: The Virtual Reality Pedestrian-Autonomous Vehicle Interaction Benchmark<\/strong> 24. Face2Multimodal: In-vehicle Multi-modal Predictors via Facial Expressions<\/strong> Moderator:<\/strong> Effect of Visualization of Pedestrian Intention Recognition on Trust and Cognitive Load
Deike Albers, Technical University of Munich
Niklas Grabbe, Technical University of Munich
Dominik Janetzko, Technical University of Munich
Klaus Bengler, Technical University of Munich<\/p>\n20<\/s> FULL<\/p>\n
deike.albers(Replace this parenthesis with the @ sign)tum.de<\/span><\/p>\nSaluton! How do you evaluate usability? – Virtual Workshop on Usability Assessments of Automated Driving Systems<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
The usability of human-machine-interfaces (HMIs) for automated driving systems (ADS) gains importance with the imminent introduction of SAE L3 automated vehicles. Assuming global proliferation of automated vehicles, a common understanding of usability for ADS HMIs and its application in research and industry is indispensable. In reference to ISO 9241-11, this virtual workshop aims to identify potential differences in the understanding and the resulting assessment of usability. The international audience of the Automotive-UI poses an ideal setting for this purpose by bringing together academics and practitioners in the domain of automotive user-interfaces. The experimental design for an international usability study serves as an illustrative case example for the discussion. Participants learn about methods, challenges and current research on international evaluations of automotive user interfaces. The workshop\u2019s goal is to jointly derive a consensus for the theoretical and practical interpretation of the term usability in the context of HMIs for automated driving.<\/p>\n03:00 – 04:00 AM EDT
Workshop 5 – Repeat<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Chihab Nadri, Virginia Tech
Jingyi Li, LMU Munich
Esther Bosch, German Aerospace Center (DLR)
Michael Oehl, German Aerospace Center (DLR)
Ignacio Alvarez, Intel Labs
Michael Braun, BMW Group Research
Myounghoon Jeon, Virginia Tech<\/p>\n18<\/s> FULL<\/p>\n
cnadri(Replace this parenthesis with the @ sign)vt.edu<\/span>\">cnadri(Replace this parenthesis with the @ sign)vt.edu<\/span><\/a><\/p>\nEmotion GaRage Vol. II: A Workshop on Affective In-Vehicle Display Design<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Driver performance and behavior can be partially predicated based on one\u2019s emotional state. Through ascertaining the emotional state of passengers and employing various mitigation strategies, empathic cars can show potential in improving user experience and driving performance. Challenges remain in the implementation of such strategies, as individual differences play a large role in mediating the effect of affective intervention. Therefore, we propose a workshop that aims to bring together researchers and practitioners interested in affective interfaces and in-vehicle technologies as a forum for the development of targeted emotion intervention methods. During the workshop, we will focus on a common set of use cases and generate approaches that can suit different user groups. By the end of this short workshop, researchers will determine ideal intervention methods for prospective user groups. This will be achieved through the method of insight combination to generate and discuss ideas.<\/p>\n04:00 – 05:00 AM EDT
Full Paper Presentation 4<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Bastian Pfleging
<\/i>Gesa Wiegand<\/p>\nCommunication with Other Road Users I<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
<\/strong>Mark Colley, Stefanos Can Mytilineos, Marcel Walch, Jan Gugenheimer, Enrico Rukzio<\/p>\n
<\/strong>Mirjam Lanzer, Franziska Babel, Fei Yan, Bihan Zhang, Fang You, Jianmin Wang, Martin Baumann<\/p>\n
<\/strong>Andreas L\u00f6cken, Pascal Brunner, Ronald Kates, Andreas Riener<\/p>\n05:00 – 06:00 AM EDT
Full Paper Presentation 5<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Gary Burnett
<\/i>Shadan Sadeghian<\/p>\nAdvanced Interfaces: Design and Applications<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
<\/strong>Patrick Ebel, Florian Brokhausen, Andreas Vogelsang<\/p>\n
<\/strong>Andreas Riegler, Bilal Aksoy, Andreas Riener, Clemens Holzmann<\/p>\n
<\/strong>Vanessa Tobisch, Markus Funk, Adam Emfield<\/p>\n
<\/strong>Chao Wang, Matti Kr\u00fcger, Christiane B. Wiebel-Herboth<\/p>\n06:00 – 07:00 AM EDT
WIP POSTER \u2018LIVE CHAT\u2019 3\u00a0<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Martina Schu\u00df, Andreas Riener<\/i><\/p>\n
Jingyi Li, Ceenu George, Andrea Ngao, Kai Holl\u00e4nder, Stefan Mayer, Andreas Butz<\/i><\/p>\n
Eddie Brown, David R. Large, Hannah Limerick, Gary Burnett<\/i><\/p>\n
Shabnam Haghzare, Jennifer Campos, Alex Mihailidis<\/i><\/p>\n
Erfan Pakdamanian<\/i><\/p>\n
Young Woo Kim, Jae Hyun Han, Yong Gu Ji, Seul Chan Lee<\/i><\/p>\n
Brook Abegaz, Eric Chan-Tin, Neil Klingensmith, George K. Thiruvathukal<\/i><\/p>\n
Patrizia Di Campli San Vito, Edward Brown, Stephen Brewster, Frank Pollick, Simon Thompson, Lee Skrypchuk, Alexandros Mouzakitis<\/i><\/p>\n
Chia-Ming Chang<\/i><\/p>\n
Subrahmanya Gunaga, Nalini C. Iyer, Akash Kulkarni<\/i><\/p>\n
Ana Dalipi, Dongfang Liu, Xiaolei Guo, Yingjie Victor Chen, Christos Mousas<\/i><\/p>\n
Zhentao Huang, Rongze Li, Wangkai Jin, Zilin Song, Yu Zhang, Xiangjun Peng, Xu Sun<\/i><\/p>\n10:00 – 11:00 AM EDT
Full Paper Presentation 6<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Dina Kanaan
<\/i>Andreas Riener\u00a0<\/p>\nCommunication with Other Road Users II<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
<\/strong>Mark Colley, Christian Br\u00e4uner, Mirjam Lanzer, Marcel Walch, Martin Baumann, Enrico Rukzio<\/p>\n